This article was originally written in English. If your browser is set to Dutch, it may be translated automatically. Please note that automated translations may contain grammatical errors or inaccuracies.
The five challenges LEGO® Serious Play® helps solve
Over the years facilitating LEGO® Serious Play® workshops, I’ve noticed patterns. Organizations come to me with different presenting problems – strategy alignment, team dysfunction, change resistance, diversity challenges – but underneath, they’re often dealing with the same core issues.
What makes LEGO® Serious Play® powerful is that it doesn’t just address surface symptoms. The methodology creates conditions where deeper challenges can be surfaced, explored, and genuinely resolved. Based on my experience working with teams across sectors, here are five common challenges where LSP consistently delivers breakthrough results.
Challenge 1: The loudest voices dominate, while valuable perspectives remain unheard
The problem
You know the pattern: meetings where the same three people speak, while others sit silently. The extroverts think out loud. The senior leaders share first, unconsciously setting boundaries on what can be said. Non-native speakers struggle to jump into fast-paced discussions. Introverts need processing time that rapid-fire meetings don’t provide.
The result? Organizations make decisions based on incomplete information. They miss the insights that quiet team members could contribute. They perpetuate power dynamics that prevent genuine diversity of thought.
One manager told me: “We hired for diversity, but our meetings sound like one person talking to themselves. We’re not accessing the wisdom we brought into the room.”
How LSP solves it
LEGO® Serious Play® fundamentally restructures participation:
Built-in thinking time: Everyone gets silent building time before any discussion. This levels the playing field—introverts and non-native speakers have the same time to develop their thoughts as quick verbal processors.
Everyone builds, everyone shares: The facilitated process ensures 100% participation. There’s no hiding, but there’s also no dominating. Each person gets equal time to share their model.
Focus shifts from person to model: When discussing “what this model shows” rather than “what I think,” people feel safer sharing perspectives that might differ from leadership or majority views.
I facilitated a strategy workshop where a junior team member built a model showing a critical gap in the proposed approach. In a traditional meeting, she might never have spoken up. But through her model, she could show what she saw—and it fundamentally shifted the strategy. The CEO later told me: “That’s exactly the kind of insight we needed, and we would have missed it without this process.”
What you’ll achieve
- Truly equitable participation where every voice contributes
- Access to insights from people who typically don’t speak in meetings
- Decisions based on collective wisdom, not just the loudest opinions
- Team members feeling genuinely heard and valued
Challenge 2: Abstract concepts and complex challenges feel impossible to discuss productively
The problem
Try having a productive meeting about “organizational culture” or “our vision for the future” or “what psychological safety means here.” These abstract concepts are critically important, but purely verbal discussions often go in circles. People use the same words to mean different things. Conversations stay theoretical rather than grounded. After an hour of talking, you’re not sure you’ve actually made progress.
Complex challenges with multiple interconnected factors are equally difficult. How do you discuss a situation where there’s no clear right answer, multiple valid perspectives, and uncertainty about the path forward?
One leadership team described their challenge: “We spent three meetings trying to align on our culture strategy. Everyone agreed it was important, but we couldn’t get concrete about what it actually meant or how to move forward.”
How LSP solves it
LEGO® Serious Play® makes the abstract tangible:
Physical models externalize thinking: When you build a model of “our ideal culture,” suddenly the abstract becomes concrete. You can point to specific elements and discuss them. You can see how pieces relate to each other.
Metaphor creates shared language: A transparent brick might represent clarity. A figure at the top might represent leadership. These visual metaphors create a shared vocabulary that pure verbal discussion often lacks.
Complexity becomes visible: When exploring complex challenges, building individual models and then looking at them together reveals patterns, connections, and tensions that are hard to see through words alone.
In a workshop on inclusive workplace culture, participants built models of what inclusion meant to them. One person included a bridge element, another showed a circle with no center, a third built layers with different colors intermingled. Through these models, we could have a concrete conversation about different dimensions of inclusion—access, belonging, integration—that had been muddy in previous verbal discussions.
What you’ll achieve
- Shared understanding of abstract concepts
- Concrete, visual reference points for ongoing discussions
- Ability to navigate complexity by making it visible
- Movement from theoretical agreement to specific, actionable insights
Challenge 3: Teams lack psychological safety to discuss real issues
The problem
The elephant in the room that everyone sees but no one names. The conflict that’s politely avoided. The honest feedback that feels too risky to share. The power dynamics that prevent junior staff from challenging flawed assumptions.
Many teams operate with limited psychological safety, the shared belief that it’s safe to take interpersonal risks, to voice concerns, to admit mistakes, to challenge ideas. Without it, organizations make poor decisions based on incomplete information. Teams can’t learn from errors. Innovation stalls because people fear suggesting unconventional ideas.
A director shared with me: “We have a culture of ‘nice.’ Everyone’s polite, but we’re not honest. The real conversations happen in the parking lot after meetings, not in the room where we could actually do something about issues.”
How LSP solves it
LEGO® Serious Play® creates multiple mechanisms for building psychological safety:
Depersonalizing discussion: When you’re discussing “what this model shows” rather than “what you think,” conversations become less about defending personal positions and more about exploring ideas. This removes some of the interpersonal risk.
Metaphorical distance: Building symbolic representations allows you to address sensitive topics indirectly. You can show tension in your model without directly criticizing specific people. You can represent concerns through metaphor rather than accusation.
Equal participation structure: When everyone shares and everyone’s model is treated with equal respect regardless of role or seniority, it signals that all perspectives are valued. This structural equality builds trust.
Playful context: The hands-on, creative nature of building with LEGO® bricks shifts the emotional tone. People relax. Defenses lower. The “serious play” paradox creates space for both lightness and depth.
In a management team workshop addressing team dysfunction, participants built models showing how they experienced team dynamics. Through their models, they could show feelings of being excluded, concerns about decision-making processes, and frustrations with unclear accountability—topics that had been too charged to discuss directly. The metaphorical distance made it possible to have the real conversation.
What you’ll achieve
- Increased ability to surface and discuss difficult topics
- Reduced defensiveness in challenging conversations
- Greater trust within the team
- Permission to be honest about what’s actually happening
Challenge 4: Change initiatives meet resistance because people don’t feel ownership
The problem
Leadership announces a new strategy, a reorganization, a culture change initiative. The communication is professional. The business case is clear. And yet…implementation stalls. People comply on the surface but don’t truly commit. The change doesn’t stick.
Why? Because change was done to people, not with them. When people don’t participate in shaping change, they don’t feel ownership of it. They may understand the logic intellectually, but they don’t feel invested emotionally. They become recipients or resistors rather than co-creators.
A change manager told me: “We communicated the change extensively. Town halls, emails, FAQs. But six months later, people still talk about ‘their change’ as if it’s something being imposed rather than something we’re building together.”
How LSP solves it
LEGO® Serious Play® transforms the change process from announcement to co-creation:
Participation creates ownership: When people build models of their vision for change, when they contribute to shaping the path forward, when their insights genuinely influence outcomes—they stop being passive recipients and become active co-creators.
Understanding emerges collectively: Rather than leadership explaining the change and hoping people “get it,” LSP enables the group to construct shared understanding together. This collective meaning-making creates deeper commitment.
Concerns surface constructively: Instead of resistance being expressed as opposition, concerns can be built into models and explored as valuable information. “What barriers do you see?” becomes a legitimate question that generates insights rather than resistance.
Connection builds throughout the process: The relationships and trust built during LSP workshops create social capital that supports change implementation. People are more likely to support change when they feel connected to those leading and implementing it.
I facilitated a year-end reflection and visioning workshop where participants built models of their hopes for the coming year. Through this process, they didn’t just receive leadership’s vision—they contributed to shaping it. The models revealed priorities and concerns that hadn’t been on leadership’s radar. More importantly, participants left the workshop feeling like co-authors of the vision, not just recipients of it.
What you’ll achieve
- Genuine buy-in rather than compliance
- Shared ownership of change direction and implementation
- Reduced resistance because concerns are surfaced and addressed
Energy and commitment for moving forward together
Challenge 5: Diversity exists on paper but doesn’t translate to innovation or better decisions
The problem
Organizations invest in diversity recruitment. They measure representation. They celebrate diversity days. But the promised benefits—innovation, better problem-solving, broader perspectives—don’t materialize.
Why? Because diversity alone isn’t enough. Without inclusion and psychological safety, diverse teams actually perform worse than homogeneous ones. Diverse perspectives remain unvoiced. Different ways of thinking get suppressed in favor of conformity. The potential wisdom in the room stays locked.
As one HR director told me: “We have diversity in our headcount. But in our meetings, everyone sounds the same. We’re not actually getting the benefit of the different perspectives we hired.”
How LSP solves it
LEGO® Serious Play® unlocks the value of diversity by creating conditions for genuine inclusion:
Non-verbal expression reduces barriers: Language and cultural communication norms affect who speaks up in meetings. Building with LEGO® bricks reduces these barriers—the models speak for themselves, and everyone can explain their model in their own way.
Different thinking styles all contribute: Linear thinkers, visual thinkers, systems thinkers—all can represent their thinking through models. No single cognitive or communication style is privileged.
Conflict becomes productive: When diverse perspectives create tension, LSP doesn’t push for quick consensus. Instead, it creates space to explore differences, understand where they come from, and find integrative solutions that honor multiple viewpoints.
Everyone’s contribution is valued equally: The structure explicitly signals that the intern’s model matters as much as the VP’s model. This structural inclusion helps shift culture.
In an inclusion workshop I facilitated for Gemeente Den Haag, participants explored identity, privilege, and belonging. Through building and sharing models, people could express experiences and perspectives that would have been difficult to voice in traditional discussion. One participant, who had been quiet in previous team meetings, built a powerful model showing her experience as someone whose identity was often invisible to colleagues. Her sharing sparked a conversation that transformed the team’s understanding of inclusion.
What you’ll achieve
- Actual innovation and better decision-making from diverse perspectives
- Team members feeling safe to show up as their full selves
- Productive exploration of differences rather than pressure to conform
- Culture shift from diversity as headcount to inclusion as practice
Beyond problem-solving: Building something better
These five challenges—inequitable participation, abstract complexity, lack of psychological safety, change resistance, and unutilized diversity—represent some of the most common reasons organizations seek out LEGO® Serious Play®. But here’s what I’ve learned from facilitating these workshops:
LSP doesn’t just solve the presenting problem. It builds something more fundamental: the relationships, trust, shared understanding, and sense of belonging that allow teams to tackle any challenge more effectively.
When voices are heard, when thinking becomes visible, when safety exists for honest dialogue, when ownership is shared, when diversity truly enriches the work—that’s when teams move from merely functioning to genuinely thriving.
That’s when co-creation becomes possible. And that’s when positive change becomes sustainable.
Is your team facing one of these challenges?
If you recognize your team in any of these challenges, LEGO® Serious Play® might be exactly what you need. Not as a one-time fix, but as a methodology for building the foundation that allows your team to work together more effectively on whatever challenges you face.
I’d love to explore whether LSP is the right fit for your specific situation. Every organization is unique, and the power of this methodology is that it can be adapted to your particular needs, goals, and context.
