This article was originally written in English. If your browser is set to Dutch, it may be translated automatically. Please note that automated translations may contain grammatical errors or inaccuracies.
What we don’t say: self-silencing in online communities
Have you ever written a comment and then deleted it before posting? Or sat in a discussion thinking, “I’d rather not say this”? You’re not alone. Researchers call this self-silencing: keeping your opinion to yourself when nobody has asked you to.
Self-silencing isn’t always a problem. Sometimes pausing before you speak is wise. But when many people stay quiet for the same reasons, a community loses important signals, especially on topics like diversity and inclusion.
What the research shows
Anna Gibson (2019) compared two Reddit communities with similar topics and sizes. One had a strict “safe space” policy, and the other allowed almost everything. Her main findings:
- In the safe space, moderators removed comments far more often: 8.1% compared with 1.8%.
- Users deleted their own comments slightly more often in the safe space: 5.0% compared with 4.8%. The difference is small but statistically significant.
- People who posted in both communities used different language in each. The environment shapes how we speak, not just who we are.
Gibson’s study has limits. It looked at anonymous online forums, so it shows that environments matter but not exactly how they work in every community.
The idea that people stay silent to avoid isolation isn’t new. Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann described it in 1974 as the spiral of silence. People who believe they hold a minority view express it less. That makes the minority look smaller, so even more people stay quiet.
James Detert and Amy Edmondson (2011) found that people often follow unspoken rules, such as “It’s safer not to challenge the boss.” These rules are rarely stated, but they shape what people feel able to say.
Why this matters for community managers
In most communities, many people read along. A reply that never appears is also information. We don’t know what we’re missing when people want to speak but don’t.
Think of a member who believes a policy affects some members unfairly. Or someone who wants to raise a concern about how people are talking to each other, but fears being labelled as “unwelcoming” for doing so. These people often stay silent.
This is the paradox: rules meant to keep a space safe can also cause silence. And silence means we don’t hear what’s really going on.
Safety and openness are not opposites
Safety doesn’t mean everyone agrees. It means people can speak without being punished for it, even when they disagree. That takes effort from everyone:
- Ask before you judge. “What do you mean by that?” opens a conversation. “That’s wrong” closes it.
- Address ideas, not people. Criticising a position is different from attacking a person.
- Make room for other voices. If you’re a leader, listening before you respond can encourage others to speak.
- Respond when something is good, too. A short “Thanks for sharing this” can make a real difference to someone who was unsure.
What community managers can do
If you want people to speak up, consider:
- Being clear about what is and isn’t acceptable, and why. Vague rules often make people more cautious than clear ones.
- Looking at who isn’t participating, not just who is.
- Reviewing your guidelines regularly and asking members what they miss.
- Watching for quiet topics. When a subject that used to attract discussion goes silent, find out why.
Your part
Is there a topic you care about but haven’t yet dared to discuss? Start small. Ask a question instead of taking a firm position, or ask a trusted colleague what they think.
Silence is sometimes a deliberate choice. But it’s worth knowing why you’re staying quiet.#
Sources
- Gibson, A. (2019). Free Speech and Safe Spaces: How Moderation Policies Shape Online Discussion Spaces. Social Media + Society, 5(1).
- Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2).
- Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work. Academy of Management Journal.
